Good sense and a familiarity with U.S. Constitutional Law tells me that if what the NSA was doing was constitutional and required to the security of the republic, Congress and the National public would have previously known about it. One of many significant hallmarks of a tyrannically repressive government is their clandestine acquisition, and use, of particular details about people to be able to have manipulative levers with which to control their behaviors. The 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights states, in text:
“The proper of individuals to be secure in their people, houses, papers, and consequences, against weird searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants will matter, but upon possible cause, supported by Pledge or affirmation, and particularly explaining the place to be searched, and the individuals or what to be seized 保鑣 .
So, if the 4th Amendment could possibly be practically re-phrased in gentle of the personal papers and ramifications of individuals in the 21st Century computer era, since the use of typewriters, cursive publishing, and printing on paper have already been generally changed by the electronic files of computer term processors, it could possibly be as these:
“The right of individuals to be secure inside their persons, properties, documents (encompassing all old-fashioned writings by pen, pad, and typewriter, and electronic copies of all transmitted e-mails, all electric copies of manuscripts, and letters) and bodily and electronic results, against silly research and seizures, shall not be violated… “
